Skip to main content

The Poesie Trois Menagerie Reading London

French poet and inventor Jean-Jacques Lapierre with one of his poetry devices
The French are Coming!  Building on the avant-garde experimental linguistically unusual other alternative hybrid work of poet-promoters like S.J. Fowler, and Tom Chivers, the pioneering Paris-based poet and inventor Jean-Jacques Lapierre (above) is bringing his Poesie Trois Menagerie series to London this May, in a deliberate attempt to provoke comparisons to the Futurist visits of almost a century ago.  Lapierre senses a swing to the Euro-text, as he calls it, in London - already home to nearly a million French speakers - and wants to start a cross-chunnel 21st century poetic revolution.

In a bizarre mixture of revolutionary France, and Alice in Wonderland, Lapierre's first installation-poem will be Robespierre Through The Looking-Guillotine, in which effigies of Larkin, Ted Hughes, and T.S. Eliot will be decapitated by a rowdy bunch of LangPo reciting executioners.  "Death To The Verse Ancien Regime!" he exclaims in his exclusive April interview with Eyewear.  Lapierre is the latest in a long line of francophone mathematical geniuses to become poets, albeit poets with a penchant for fashioning tiny intricate machines invisible to the naked eye - or, as he calls it, les mouches de mot - playing on the idea of a fly in the ointment of mainstream poetry.

Lapierre, who was trained as an engineer at the Academie Polytechnique Francois Xavier IX in the thirteenth circle of Paris, has long been associated with Les Nulles, poet-technicians who seek to fuse the innovative nature of French science and cuisine, with the French desire for poetry that goes beyond the thinkable, and, especially, the dull Anglo-Saxon way of writing poems that rhyme and mean something.  The Poesie Trois Menagerie will therefore see 176 European ultra-modernists descending on a disused hospital in Hackney, where, for three days, they will hold debates, quarrels, jousts, pranks (les pranques), acrobatic displays, invention inventories, and of course the mock beheadings.  Each poet will read their work - if reading is a word that makes sense in this context - dressed as either Robespierre or Alice in Wonderland, or, in Tokyo-style, a bizarre mix of both.

At the end of this symposium, Je Suis Superieure Press, based in Cambridge and Neuilly-Sur-Seine, will publish a 1,000 page e-book on the best of the collaborations-inventions.  LANGUE EST UN PETIT ROBOT QUI S'APPELE APPOLINAIRE.  DADA EST MUM! is the rallying cry.  May 1-3, 2012, Hackney Hospital For The Criminally Europhile.  Tickets are available from Oxfam Books & Music, call Martin Poisson.

Comments

Poetry Pleases! said…
Dear Todd

As I understand it, modernism started in France anyway and was susequently hijacked by les rosbifs so perhaps they are simply trying to reclaim it. Bonne chance mes amis!

Best wishes from Simon

Popular posts from this blog

CLIVE WILMER'S THOM GUNN SELECTED POEMS IS A MUST-READ

THAT HANDSOME MAN  A PERSONAL BRIEF REVIEW BY TODD SWIFT I could lie and claim Larkin, Yeats , or Dylan Thomas most excited me as a young poet, or even Pound or FT Prince - but the truth be told, it was Thom Gunn I first and most loved when I was young. Precisely, I fell in love with his first two collections, written under a formalist, Elizabethan ( Fulke Greville mainly), Yvor Winters triad of influences - uniquely fused with an interest in homerotica, pop culture ( Brando, Elvis , motorcycles). His best poem 'On The Move' is oddly presented here without the quote that began it usually - Man, you gotta go - which I loved. Gunn was - and remains - so thrilling, to me at least, because so odd. His elegance, poise, and intelligence is all about display, about surface - but the surface of a panther, who ripples with strength beneath the skin. With Gunn, you dressed to have sex. Or so I thought.  Because I was queer (I maintain the right to lay claim to that

IQ AND THE POETS - ARE YOU SMART?

When you open your mouth to speak, are you smart?  A funny question from a great song, but also, a good one, when it comes to poets, and poetry. We tend to have a very ambiguous view of intelligence in poetry, one that I'd say is dysfunctional.  Basically, it goes like this: once you are safely dead, it no longer matters how smart you were.  For instance, Auden was smarter than Yeats , but most would still say Yeats is the finer poet; Eliot is clearly highly intelligent, but how much of Larkin 's work required a high IQ?  Meanwhile, poets while alive tend to be celebrated if they are deemed intelligent: Anne Carson, Geoffrey Hill , and Jorie Graham , are all, clearly, very intelligent people, aside from their work as poets.  But who reads Marianne Moore now, or Robert Lowell , smart poets? Or, Pound ?  How smart could Pound be with his madcap views? Less intelligent poets are often more popular.  John Betjeman was not a very smart poet, per se.  What do I mean by smart?

"I have crossed oceans of time to find you..."

In terms of great films about, and of, love, we have Vertigo, In The Mood for Love , and Casablanca , Doctor Zhivago , An Officer and a Gentleman , at the apex; as well as odder, more troubling versions, such as Sophie's Choice and  Silence of the Lambs .  I think my favourite remains Bram Stoker's Dracula , with the great immortal line "I have crossed oceans of time to find you...".